By Diane Lee
Gluttony—overindulging in food or drink—was one of the seven deadly sins of the medieval European church. In the medieval view, the story of Adam and Eve established ‘gluttony’ as man’s original and worst sin. Tempted by the snake, they ate the forbidden fruit from the tree of knowledge and were banished from the Garden of Eden, causing the fall of mankind.
Many images in medieval and Renaissance art portray peasants gorging and carousing, seeming to suggest that low social class went hand in hand with gluttony and other bad behaviour. This 15th-century image, for example, shows us two groups of people having a meal. The “intemperate” peasants at front cause a drunken ruckus, while the “temperate” group of nobles behind them eat modestly with upright postures.
The message is clear: The rich are good, the poor are trouble.
Was this really true? Well…no. For one thing, only the rich could afford to commission artworks, including painted books. Wealthy patrons wanted nothing more than to be portrayed in the most noble and honourable way. In a world where Christian principles were the law, one did not want to be seen as gluttonous and therefore hell bound
It would have been difficult for peasants to overindulge when they didn’t even have enough to eat each day. Growing and making food for subsistence was the full-time job of many peasants, and their daily lives revolved around the harvest cycle. Famines were frequent and had devastating effects on the farming poor who often had no choice but to starve or beg when their crops failed.
Other medieval images pick up this point, damning the wealthy as the true gluttons. Take this depiction of the biblical parable of the Feast of Dives. It tells the story of a wealthy man (Dives) who refuses to help a beggar (Lazarus) who humbly asks for some scraps of food. Instead, Dives sends his dogs after Lazarus, who later dies from hunger.
Dives, with his double chin and rotund form, is portrayed as a bad Christian because of his gluttonous nature and his unwillingness to spare food for a poor man. At the bottom of this illumination, two angels fly above Lazarus’s dead body and wrap his soul with a white cloak, clearly marking Lazarus as the good Christian.
So were the wealthy more gluttonous than the poor? We can’t say whether they were more sinful, but they certainly had more to eat.
The medieval rich had much more time, leisure, and money than the poor to enjoy nutritious food. Hunting, for example, was a common pastime of the nobility. The catch from these hunting sprees soon after graced the tables of noblemen, who enjoyed bounteous food and drink at the feasts that followed. Grains and beans were the mainstay of the medieval peasant’s diet, with meat and dairy rare luxuries.
The ultimate in upper-crust gluttony is represented by the feasting Janus figure below, whose two heads allow him to eat twice as much as a normal man. The table brims with vessels and utensils, suggesting the abundance of food found in January, when farming work was replaced by feasting on the fall harvest. The lower classes only got a glimpse of such splendid feasts as cooks, servers, or consumers of scraps—if the hosts decided to give the leftover food to charity.
Diane Lee is a junior intern at Pomona College.
Featured Image Source: Wallpapers Craft